Academic and Research Partnerships for Climate-Resilient Agriculture and Food Systems (Call for Proposals)

The United Nations University (UNU) has issued a call for proposals that marks a pivotal moment for academic institutions seeking to influence climate adaptation in agriculture. This initiative is not merely a research grant; it is a strategic platform for co-creating knowledge that bridges the gap between science, policy, and practice. The call targets consortia led by academic or research entities, with a clear mandate to address the vulnerability of smallholder farmers, the backbone of food production in the Global South. The UNU emphasizes that projects must be transdisciplinary, integrating natural sciences, social sciences, and local knowledge systems. This means that applicants must be adept at facilitating genuine partnerships with community-based organizations and government agencies, not just tokenistic inclusion. Financially, the call is generous but demands accountability. Grants range from €500,000 to €2,000,000, with a typical duration of 2-4 years. The budget must be justified with a clear narrative linking activities to costs, and the UNU expects a co-financing contribution of at least 10% (in-kind or cash) from the consortium. This makes financial planning a critical success factor. Moreover, the UNU operates with a high level of transparency and compliance; all expenditures will be subject to external audits, and the grant agreement will include strict reporting requirements. Therefore, institutions that have not previously managed large donor grants are advised to undergo capacity building in financial management and grants administration. From a political angle, this call aligns with the UNU's mission to 'contribute to the resolution of pressing global problems'. The selected projects will be seen as flagship initiatives that showcase the UNU's commitment to actionable research. The donor expects dissemination of results through high-impact publications, but also through policy briefs, community workshops, and open-access data platforms. This dual expectation of academic rigor and practical relevance is a hallmark of UNU-funded projects. In summary, this overview sets the stage for a deep-dive into the technical and strategic components that will enable applicants to craft a winning proposal. The remainder of this dossier unpacks the eligibility criteria, donor priorities, implementation roadmap, and risk mitigation strategies, all while highlighting how GSLI's training portfolio can fill capacity gaps and increase the likelihood of success.

Strategic Overview

The United Nations University (UNU) has issued a call for proposals that marks a pivotal moment for academic institutions seeking to influence climate adaptation in agriculture. This initiative is not merely a research grant; it is a strategic platform for co-creating knowledge that bridges the gap between science, policy, and practice. The call targets consortia led by academic or research entities, with a clear mandate to address the vulnerability of smallholder farmers, the backbone of food production in the Global South. The UNU emphasizes that projects must be transdisciplinary, integrating natural sciences, social sciences, and local knowledge systems. This means that applicants must be adept at facilitating genuine partnerships with community-based organizations and government agencies, not just tokenistic inclusion. Financially, the call is generous but demands accountability. Grants range from €500,000 to €2,000,000, with a typical duration of 2-4 years. The budget must be justified with a clear narrative linking activities to costs, and the UNU expects a co-financing contribution of at least 10% (in-kind or cash) from the consortium. This makes financial planning a critical success factor. Moreover, the UNU operates with a high level of transparency and compliance; all expenditures will be subject to external audits, and the grant agreement will include strict reporting requirements. Therefore, institutions that have not previously managed large donor grants are advised to undergo capacity building in financial management and grants administration. From a political angle, this call aligns with the UNU's mission to 'contribute to the resolution of pressing global problems'. The selected projects will be seen as flagship initiatives that showcase the UNU's commitment to actionable research. The donor expects dissemination of results through high-impact publications, but also through policy briefs, community workshops, and open-access data platforms. This dual expectation of academic rigor and practical relevance is a hallmark of UNU-funded projects. In summary, this overview sets the stage for a deep-dive into the technical and strategic components that will enable applicants to craft a winning proposal. The remainder of this dossier unpacks the eligibility criteria, donor priorities, implementation roadmap, and risk mitigation strategies, all while highlighting how GSLI's training portfolio can fill capacity gaps and increase the likelihood of success.

Who is it For?

This call is primarily targeted at academic and research institutions—such as universities, research centers, and think tanks—that possess a robust portfolio in agricultural sciences, climate change adaptation, and food systems research. Eligible lead applicants must be legally established in a UN member state and demonstrate a proven track record of managing collaborative research projects with an international dimension. In addition, the UNU encourages partnerships that include non-academic actors: local NGOs, farmer cooperatives, private sector entities (especially agri-tech startups), and governmental agencies. The call specifically welcomes consortia from low- and middle-income countries, where climate impacts on agriculture are most severe, as well as partnerships between institutions in the Global North and South to foster co-creation of knowledge and capacity transfer. Individual researchers without institutional backing are not eligible. Furthermore, the UNU places strong emphasis on gender equity and inclusion: proposals must outline how women, youth, and marginalized communities are integrated as both beneficiaries and active participants in the research process. Stakeholder analysis is critical; the call expects applicants to map power dynamics and ensure that local knowledge holders are part of the research design. Demonstrating prior engagement with farming communities and policy makers will significantly strengthen a proposal. Crucially, the lead applicant must have adequate financial and administrative capacity to manage multi-year grants, which includes having established internal controls and audit procedures. GSLI's training in 'Writing Winning Proposals' and 'Financial Management for NGOs' directly addresses these requirements by equipping teams with skills in budget narrative development, compliance with donor regulations, and crafting compelling project narratives that align with donor priorities.

Priorities

The UNU has outlined several thematic and operational priorities that proposals must address to be competitive. Thematic priorities include: (1) Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA): research that integrates productivity, adaptation, and mitigation, with a focus on soil health, water conservation, and carbon sequestration. (2) Agroecological Transition: studies on diversifying crop systems, restoring ecosystem services, and reducing synthetic inputs. (3) Digital Agriculture and Precision Farming: use of remote sensing, IoT, AI, and mobile technologies to enhance climate risk assessment and resource efficiency. (4) Food System Governance: policy analysis and institutional frameworks that promote inclusive and resilient food value chains. (5) Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture: linking climate resilience with improved dietary outcomes, especially for vulnerable groups. Operational priorities are equally specific: (a) Transdisciplinarity: projects must involve stakeholders from the beginning (co-design/co-implementation). (b) Capacity Strengthening: each project must include a substantial training component for local researchers, extension agents, and farmers. (c) Gender and Social Inclusion: a gender analysis must be integrated into every activity, with specific budgets for gender-sensitive interventions. (d) Open Science: data and findings must be accessible via open-access platforms. (e) Policy Relevance: research outcomes should be actionable and aimed at informing national or regional agricultural and climate policies. The UNU also expects value for money: budgets should be realistic, with direct costs not exceeding 25% of total budget for administrative overhead. Co-financing (in-kind or cash) is highly desirable and can amount to at least 10% of the total project cost. The donor emphasizes sustainability beyond the project period; therefore a clear exit strategy and scaling plan are mandatory. In summary, proposals that align with the UNU's strategic framework on climate resilience and demonstrate impact pathways through measurable KPIs (e.g., hectares converted to CSA, number of farmers adopting new practices) will gain priority.

Eligibility

Eligibility criteria are stringent and require a thorough legal and financial pre-audit. First, the lead applicant must be a legally registered academic or research institution with a charter or equivalent documentation proving non-profit status. The institution must have been operational for at least five years and have a demonstrated record of managing international research grants of equivalent size (minimum €500,000). Financial health is critical: the applicant must submit audited financial statements for the past three years, showing positive net assets and liquidity ratios above 1.0. The donor will not fund institutions undergoing bankruptcy or litigation. Second, the consortium must include at least three partners from two different countries, each playing a substantive role. All partners must sign a memorandum of understanding outlining roles, budgets, and intellectual property arrangements. Partners from UNU-associated institutes are eligible but cannot exceed 50% of the total budget. Third, excluded entities are those listed on any UN or international sanctions list, as well as entities that have been disbarred by any major donor (e.g., World Bank, EU). Additionally, proposals that lead to intellectual property exclusively owned by a private company are not eligible; any IP developed must be shared on fair terms and contribute to the public good. In terms of spatial eligibility, activities must be conducted in low- or middle-income countries as per OECD DAC list; however, a small portion of the budget (up to 10%) can be used for high-income country partners if justified. Finally, the call requires a conflict of interest disclosure form. Institutions that have previously held a UNU grant must provide a final report and no outstanding audit queries. GSLI’s 'Grants Management' course provides step-by-step guidance on setting up compliance systems, preparing financial audits, and managing multi-partner consortia, making it invaluable for ensuring eligibility requirements are met.

Path to Success

To successfully secure funding from this UNU call, applicants should follow a strategic roadmap that integrates GSLI's capacity-building courses to strengthen key areas. Step 1: Pre-Concept Phase (Months 1-2): Assemble a consortium with complementary strengths. Conduct a stakeholder mapping workshop to identify research gaps and local needs. Use GSLI's 'Writing Winning Proposals' course to craft a compelling concept note that highlights the project's alignment with UNU priorities. This step is critical because the concept note is used for initial screening. Step 2: Proposal Development (Months 3-5): Develop a full proposal with a detailed theory of change, logframe, and budget. Engage in iterative writing and review. GSLI’s 'Financial Management for NGOs' course equips teams with skills to create realistic budgets with co-financing commitments and indirect cost calculations. Also, use 'Project Management for Development' to design a robust implementation timeline with clear milestones. Step 3: Technical Strengthening (Month 6): Conduct training for all partners on monitoring and evaluation, ensuring that the proposal includes a strong M&E plan with baseline and endline surveys. GSLI's 'Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E)' course provides hands-on tools for indicator selection, data collection instruments, and reporting frameworks. This aligns with the donor's requirement for measurable outcomes. Step 4: Submission and Compliance (Month 7-8): Finalize all documents, obtain signatures from legal representatives, and compile supporting documents (audit reports, MoUs, CVs). Use GSLI’s 'Grants Management' course to review compliance checklist and avoid common pitfalls. Additionally, 'Writing Winning Proposals' can help refine the executive summary and risk management section. By integrating these courses, the consortium demonstrates not only technical expertise but also institutional capacity to manage donor funds effectively. GSLI’s training also helps articulate a cross-selling strategy: for example, if funded, the consortium can embed WASH components (linked to irrigation water quality) or public health aspects (e.g., food safety) through our short courses.

Recommended GSLI Courses

Deadline: 2026-09-30

Persona: General

Urgency: Normal